Technip-Coflexip V Confédération Générale du Travail (CGT)

Overview

NCP Decision No Decision
Current Status No Information
Date Submitted 01/03/2004
Case Duration 771 weeks and 4 days so far
Host Country France  (OECD member)
Sector Building and Construction 

Oil and Gas 

Issue(s) Support for trade union activities
Provisions Cited IV.1-a   
Case Description In March 2004, the French trade union confederation Confédération Générale du Travail (CGT) filed a case with the French NCP regarding the conduct of Technip-Coflexip, which had deducted part of an employee's salary for going on a trade union mission to the US.
Developments TUAC has no further information on this case.

Organisations

Lead NCP France NCP : Tripartite (involving several government departments and the social partners) 

Companies

Multinational Company Technip-Coflexip

Complainants

Lead Complainant Confédération Générale du Travail (CGT) : National Centre 

TUAC Analysis

Did the NCP publish its initial assessment? status-icon
Did the case involve parallel proceedings? status-icon
Was the existence of parallel proceedings an obstacle to the NCP accepting the case? status-icon
Was the businsess relationship other than that of a subsidiary? status-icon
Was the nature of the business relationship an obstacle to the NCP accepting the case? status-icon
Did the NCP inform other relevant government departments about its acceptance of this case? status-icon
Did the NCP offer mediation or conciliation? status-icon
Did the company accept the offer of mediation or conciliation? status-icon
Did the complainant(s) accept the offer of mediation or conciliation? status-icon
Was mediation or conciliation held? status-icon
Was mediation or conciliation conducted by a professional mediator? status-icon
Did the parties reach agreement? status-icon
If yes, did the NCP publish this agreement following the consent of the parties? status-icon
If mediation was refused or failed did the NCP make an assessment of whether the company had breached the Guidelines? status-icon
Did the NCP conduct in-host country fact finding? status-icon
Did the NCP make recommendations to the company on the future implementation of the Guidelines? status-icon
Did the NCP publish its final statement or report? status-icon
Did the NCP provide for follow-up of the agreement/recommendations? status-icon
Did the NCP inform other relevant government departments about its final statement or report? status-icon
Did the NCP inform public pension funds about its final statement or report? status-icon
Did the NCP apply any consequences in this case? status-icon
Did the NCP follow the indicative timescales set out in the procedural guidance? status-icon
Was there a positive outcome for the workers involved in this case? status-icon
Did the filing of the case under the Guidelines have a positive impact for the workers involved? status-icon
Did the lead NCP play a positive role? status-icon
If different, did the home NCP play a positive role? status-icon