Renault S.A., Nissan Motor. Co., Renault Nissan B.V. V United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) and IndustriALL

Overview

NCP Decision Decision Pending
Date Submitted 20/12/2016
Case Duration 43 weeks and 5 days so far
Host Countries France  (OECD member)
Japan  (OECD member)
Netherlands  (OECD member)
US  (OECD member)

Issue(s) Failure of due diligence; interference with the right to organise; anti-union campaigns
Provisions Cited  

Organisations

Lead NCP France NCP : Tripartite (involving several government departments and the social partners) 
Lead NCP Japan NCP : Interministerial Body 
Lead NCP Netherlands NCP : Independent Expert Body 

Companies

Multinational Company Renault (Home country: France)
Multinational Company Nissan (Home country: Japan)

Complainants

Lead Complainant IndustriALL : Global Union Federation 
Lead Complainant UAW United Auto Workers : National Union 

Related Documents

US NCP  [Publication date: 30/1/2015] 'U.S. NCP Final Statement UAW-IndustriALL and Nissan North America, Inc. for operations in the United States'
   https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/237185.pdf [Date URL accessed: 10/6/2015]

TUAC Analysis

Did the NCP publish its initial assessment? status-icon
Did the case involve parallel proceedings? status-icon
Was the existence of parallel proceedings an obstacle to the NCP accepting the case? status-icon
Was the businsess relationship other than that of a subsidiary? status-icon
Was the nature of the business relationship an obstacle to the NCP accepting the case? status-icon
Did the NCP inform other relevant government departments about its acceptance of this case? status-icon
Did the NCP offer mediation or conciliation? status-icon
Did the company accept the offer of mediation or conciliation? status-icon
Did the complainant(s) accept the offer of mediation or conciliation? status-icon
Was mediation or conciliation held? status-icon
Was mediation or conciliation conducted by a professional mediator? status-icon
Did the parties reach agreement? status-icon
If yes, did the NCP publish this agreement following the consent of the parties? status-icon
If mediation was refused or failed did the NCP make an assessment of whether the company had breached the Guidelines? status-icon
Did the NCP conduct in-host country fact finding? status-icon
Did the NCP make recommendations to the company on the future implementation of the Guidelines? status-icon
Did the NCP publish its final statement or report? status-icon
Did the NCP provide for follow-up of the agreement/recommendations? status-icon
Did the NCP inform other relevant government departments about its final statement or report? status-icon
Did the NCP inform public pension funds about its final statement or report? status-icon
Did the NCP apply any consequences in this case? status-icon
Did the NCP follow the indicative timescales set out in the procedural guidance? status-icon
Was there a positive outcome for the workers involved in this case? status-icon
Did the filing of the case under the Guidelines have a positive impact for the workers involved? status-icon
Did the lead NCP play a positive role? status-icon
If different, did the home NCP play a positive role? status-icon