French MNE in Romania

Overview

NCP Decision Accepted
Current Status Closed
Date Submitted 01/02/2003
Date Closed 01/07/2003
Case Duration 21 weeks and 3 days
Host Country Romania  (Adhering Country)
Issue(s) Failure to disclose information
Provisions Cited  
Case Description In February 2003, trade unions submitted a case concerning a subsidiary of a French multinational enterprise operating in Romania, which had breached the Chapter on Employment and Industrial Relations, by failing to disclose economic and financial information in the context of negotiating employee's salary increases.

TUAC does not have further information on this case. This summary is based on information provided by the OECD web site.

Developments The parties successfully concluded a collective bargaining agreement on the 12 March 2003.
Outcome The NCP took into consideration the successful negotiations and closed the specific instance accordingly.

Organisations

Lead NCP France NCP : Tripartite (involving several government departments and the social partners) 

TUAC Analysis

Did the NCP publish its initial assessment? status-icon
Did the case involve parallel proceedings? status-icon
Was the existence of parallel proceedings an obstacle to the NCP accepting the case? status-icon
Was the businsess relationship other than that of a subsidiary? status-icon
Was the nature of the business relationship an obstacle to the NCP accepting the case? status-icon
Did the NCP inform other relevant government departments about its acceptance of this case? status-icon
Did the NCP offer mediation or conciliation? status-icon
Did the company accept the offer of mediation or conciliation? status-icon
Did the complainant(s) accept the offer of mediation or conciliation? status-icon
Was mediation or conciliation held? status-icon
Was mediation or conciliation conducted by a professional mediator? status-icon
Did the parties reach agreement? status-icon
If yes, did the NCP publish this agreement following the consent of the parties? status-icon
If mediation was refused or failed did the NCP make an assessment of whether the company had breached the Guidelines? status-icon
Did the NCP conduct in-host country fact finding? status-icon
Did the NCP make recommendations to the company on the future implementation of the Guidelines? status-icon
Did the NCP publish its final statement or report? status-icon
Did the NCP provide for follow-up of the agreement/recommendations? status-icon
Did the NCP inform other relevant government departments about its final statement or report? status-icon
Did the NCP inform public pension funds about its final statement or report? status-icon
Did the NCP apply any consequences in this case? status-icon
Did the NCP follow the indicative timescales set out in the procedural guidance? status-icon
Was there a positive outcome for the workers involved in this case? status-icon
Did the filing of the case under the Guidelines have a positive impact for the workers involved? status-icon
Did the lead NCP play a positive role? status-icon
If different, did the home NCP play a positive role? status-icon